From Framework to Practice: Testing WASH Impact Indicators in the Real World
- Apr 14
- 4 min read
Updated: Apr 16
Author: Sam Mendelson & Marcela Perez.
In 2021, the WASH Action Group - co-led by e-MFP and Aqua for All - set out to address a structural problem in the sector: while WASH finance was expanding, impact measurement was not keeping pace. Across the ecosystem, financial institutions, investors, and enterprises were being asked to report similar outcomes using different indicators, definitions, and formats. This fragmentation made comparison difficult, increased reporting burden, and limited the ability of investors to interpret results across portfolios. At the same time, this constrained learning and weakened the case for scaling investment.
For the past five years, the Action Group has been trying to address a major challenge: the absence of a shared, practical approach to measuring the impact of WASH finance: to support better WASH outcomes by making WASH finance more credible, more comparable, and easier to scale. A harmonised indicator framework is not an end in itself, but a necessary condition for achieving this. Without it, it becomes significantly harder to manage performance, identify trends, allocate capital effectively, or build confidence among decision-makers.
A phased approach
So, what has happened up to now? In 2023-24, an initial set of indicators was developed to capture the financial, social, climate, and service-level dimensions of WASH investments, followed by a feasibility assessment that examined how these indicators aligned with existing practices across asset managers, financial institutions, and SMEs. This earlier research highlighted persistent challenges, including inconsistent reporting requirements, limited data availability, and the operational difficulty of capturing more complex outcomes.
Building on these findings, Phase III - which has just wrapped up - focused on pilot testing the framework with financial service providers (FSPs) in real-world settings, and refining them iteratively based on feasibility and usefulness. Working with participating FSPs, indicators were integrated into operational workflows and tested through a combination of MIS-based reporting and targeted survey tools. The process was iterative: indicators were assessed against criteria such as clarity, feasibility, ease of adoption, data availability, and analytical relevance, and then retained, refined, merged, or dropped accordingly.
This iterative approach was essential. Earlier phases had already shown that some indicators - particularly those related to health outcomes or climate - are inherently more difficult to measure, often requiring primary data collection and additional resources. Others, particularly those integrated into routine MIS collection and reporting systems, are significantly easier to capture.
The result, produced with the invaluable support of Microsave Consulting (MSC) is a validated and field-tested framework, now presented in a new report entitled Unpacking Impact to Unlock Scale: Pilot Testing the WASH Impact Indicator Framework that reflects both the ambition of standardised impact measurement and the practical realities of implementation.
The output of this research has been not only the refined WASH impact indicator framework, but also an operational manual, providing clear definitions, data sources, and reporting guidance on all 11 indicators and 44 sub-indicators, and standardised data collection tools and templates.
The indicator framework and associated tools were launched at a webinar on February 11th, and now the WASH AG must turn attention to the next important objective - adoption and use of these indicators, and development of a harmonised data collection framework for WASH finance.
So what comes next? From framework to real-world adoption
Achieving meaningful scale will require buy-in from investors, asset managers, and other ecosystem actors who shape reporting expectations and capital flows. If widely adopted, a shared approach to WASH impact measurement has the potential to reduce reporting fatigue for investees while improving transparency and comparability for investors. More importantly, it can help shift the framework from a tool used by a small number of institutions to a common language for the sector.
The next phase of work will focus on operationalising data collection and reporting at scale. The Action Group will convene an online roundtable on May 20th of WASH investors and investees to demonstrate data submission processes and explore the value proposition of standardising WASH impact data - particularly through integration with the ATLAS data platform. This will be a chance not just to demonstrate this process using real but anonymised data collected during Phase III, but a chance to hear from these participants about their pain points, capacity and priorities. We are currently having discussions with relevant stakeholders in advance of this meeting, to gather feedback, address practical considerations, and shape how this next phase is implemented.
e-MFP and Aqua for All are proud of what this AG has achieved so far, and are looking forward to taking this from framework to practice. If you would like to discuss the indicators, the round-table, WASH finance generally, or if you wish to support this work (including via funding the AG generally or any specific project in particular), please get in touch with the co-heads Sam (smendelson@e-mfp.eu) and Marcela (m.perez@aquaforall.org).
Photo credit: Masudar Rahman via pexels
About the Authors: Sam Mendelson & Marcela Perez are the co-heads of the WASH Action Group.
A Date with Death is a visual novel game that remembers everything. In this horror game, the stranger across the table does not forget a single word you say. References circle back. Contradictions are noted, gently. The conversation feels collaborative until you realize you are the only one being written down. The setting is ordinary, almost drab, which makes the growing dread feel like something you brought with you. There is no violence. There is only the slow, civil, unbearable process of being understood completely by something that should not know you at all. The date ends. The impression does not.
The atmosphere in Take Care of Shadow Milk is honestly amazing. The music, visuals, and emotional tone work together perfectly to create a game that feels unique and unforgettable. It’s rare to find a game that feels this creative and immersive from beginning to end.
Some online driving games get repetitive quickly, but Drive Mad manages to stay interesting through creative track layouts and unexpected vehicle movement. It’s challenging without feeling unfair.
This is a fantastic and insightful post—really well put together and genuinely valuable. The way you’ve explained the ideas makes it easy to connect with and apply in real situations. Content like this truly helps people think differently and take meaningful steps forward.
On a related note, for anyone looking to take their growth journey to the next level, Growth Navigate Funding is worth exploring. It focuses on helping individuals and businesses access the right funding opportunities while also guiding them strategically toward sustainable growth. Combining the right knowledge with the right financial support can make a huge difference, and platforms like this aim to bridge that gap effectively.
Really insightful how the blog highlights the shift from theory to real-world testing of WASH impact indicators, especially the challenge of making data both practical and measurable across different contexts. It shows how structured frameworks can improve transparency and decision-making in development work . In a similar way, Geomedi Medical University reflects a practical, application-focused approach in medical education, where students not only learn concepts but also apply them in real clinical settings.