MIMOSA estimating market saturation
- Nov 25, 2013
- 2 min read
Interview by B. De Bruyne with E. Javoy (Planet Rating) and D. Rozas.
Full disclosure: in addition to being co-author of MIMOSA, Daniel Rozas is the editor of the e-MFP blog.
QUESTION: Can you explain in a few words what the new Planet Rating index MIMOSA measures?
ANSWER: MIMOSA estimates how much retail credit a given country can absorb, and compares that to the actual amount of credit reported. If the amount of reported credit is significantly greater than what MIMOSA estimates as optimal amount, the market is scored as being at risk of over-capacity (e.g. scores 4 & 5, or orange & red). If it's the reverse, the market is evaluated as being under-served (scores 1 & 2, or green and light green).
QUESTION: How do you think MIMOSA can change the microfinance industry?
ANSWER: MIMOSA is easy to understand and simple to use. Some investors have already incorporated it into their decision-making process. However, MIMOSA is also a prototype model. We're currently seeking to launch the next stage of the project, MIMOSA 2.0, which will fill many of the gaps, including providing a tool to evaluate a country at the regional, or even city level. We believe it can become the de-facto standard instrument for evaluating market capacity, and also a key component in investment decision-making, and orientation of grant funding and technical assistance to where they're most needed (e.g. emphasis on overindebtedness prevention in some markets, and institutional development in others).
QUESTION: What role do you foresee for e-MFP in the future of MIMOSA?
ANSWER: I think the key value is both to communicate MIMOSA and help members learn from each other (investors, DFIs, bilateral donors, and others) on how to adopt the tool in their everyday processes.
For more information on MIMOSA, Microfinance Index of Market Outreach and Saturation, visit Planet Rating.
author: e-MFP





Honestly I’m into posts that don’t try to sound smart for no reason, and this one felt super easy to follow. I was half scrolling and still caught the main point without rereading anything. Somewhere in the middle I hopped over to thedriftboss.com and it matched that same no-fuss vibe—clean, straightforward, and you’re not digging through a bunch of clutter to find the basics. The game description is simple too: it’s that one-button drifting thing where timing is basically the whole challenge, so you get the idea immediately. I also noticed it doesn’t feel like it’s constantly interrupting you with random stuff while you’re trying to read. The way the headings break things into short chunks makes it easy to…
kèo nhà cái chuẩn hôm trước mình rảnh rỗi nên bấm vào xem thử vì thấy mọi người hay nhắc. Mình không phải dân soi kèo chuyên nghiệp đâu, chủ yếu xem cách họ làm giao diện với trình bày thông tin có dễ theo dõi không. Thấy ổn phết: bảng kèo bóng đá trực tuyến để dạng cột nhìn gọn, có tách rõ phần giờ trận đấu với mục cả trận hiệp 1 nên lướt nhanh vẫn bắt được ý. Mình cũng đọc thử đoạn “kèo nhà cái là gì”, viết kiểu giải thích thẳng, không vòng vo nên người mới cũng hiểu đại khái nhà cái đưa tỷ lệ như thế nào. Cuộn xuống là gặp mấy khối…
We believe it can become the de-facto standard instrument for evaluating market capacity, and also a key component in investment decision-making, and orientation of grant funding and technical assistance to where 2v2IO're most needed (e.g. emphasis on overindebtedness prevention in some markets, and institutional development in others).
This was an interesting read! The idea of using MIMOSA to evaluate market saturation reminds me of discussions I've had on Crazy Cattle 3D about balancing resources and demand in different industries. It's fascinating to see how such tools can influence investment strategies—definitely curious about how MIMOSA 2.0 will refine its approach.
https://keonhacai33.com/ mình ghé vào thử cho biết vì thấy bạn bè nhắc, kiểu xem trang họ bố trí ra sao thôi. Ấn tượng đầu là họ xoay quanh kèo nhà cái khá rõ, có mấy bài giải thích khái niệm/cách bắt kèo nên đọc lướt cũng hiểu được ý chính, không bị “ngợp” như nhiều trang khác. Mình không ngồi đọc kỹ từng bài, nhưng cách họ chia nội dung thành từng khối nhìn khá dễ theo dõi, kéo xuống vẫn nắm được đang ở phần nào. Mấy mục nhận định bóng đá cũng tách riêng, tiêu đề nổi nên liếc qua là biết đang nói trận nào. Nói chung giao diện không màu mè, nhìn sạch sẽ, và phần…